The Censor Bored

The moral police are the worst example of a dictatorial country. How can six bigoted fuckwits decide what others should or should not watch? Nudism according to them comes second, only to first-degree murder. Hey morons, why don’t you go to Kajuraho and Konark and take a look at what the land of Kamasutra is capable of. Actually stay away from there; you might want to dress up the sculptures in nine-yard saris.
Too much violence, nudity and sex, complain the herd following the censor propagandists lead.
Solution time:
Black out the news from Kashmir, Palestine, Sri Lanka, Chechnya, Indonesia, and Philippines. Lets go the whole hog, black out news from Africa, America, Asia and Europe. The news agencies can report about Mars, Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto. Making babies is off the list of permitted activities. Sex is a dirty word therefore any thing that has a link to sex is not acceptable. If a woman gives birth to a child, one can deduce that she did have sex (unless the son of god has returned, or she was inseminated artificially, which is a stupid idea to begin with). No more babies. Considering the current gene pool it might actually be a good idea.
Who are these people to tell me what to do and what to watch? In the guise of issuing a censor certificate they control information (If I consider my neighbor’s sexual orgies with an adolescent chicken as information, that’s my concern not theirs). Excuse me, but doesn’t the constitution guarantee the freedom of expression. How does one decide if the violence in a movie is too much or too little? Maybe they have a gore O meter. If it goes beeeeep then that’s too much violence Tone it down now or you don’t get a censor certificate. What whackos. Why is watching two consenting adults screwing onscreen such a big deal? Sixty year old actors run around trees singing songs, if anything should be cut out of a movie that throws up a more compulsive case. Who in real life does that? At least a major part of humanity involves itself in the pursuit of sex. And news channels can show graphical gunshot wounds and babies killed in fire accidents but the films that show a man being chewed to death by dogs are considered ‘not suitable for public viewing’. Reality is more violent than the most graphical images that can be conjured up in a film director’s imagination.
So what next, Mrs. and Mr. Censor? Do you want everyone’s lives to be brought to you for approval before they move on with it?
Rate the movies. A censor should, advise what is suitable for different age groups or give a fair warning about the contents of a film but should never withhold a film, music or any other form of expression with a reason that it would offend people’s senses. Those morons wouldn’t know what sense was if it walked up their nostrils.
Given a choice of being an Orwellian sheep under a group of censors with a crowbar up their pompous asses or a colonial slave, I would welcome the Brits back anytime.
All contributions to:
The Moral Police Demolition Fund
Animal Farm,
UK.